———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Paul Beame <beame@cs.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:09 AM
Subject: [cs-ugrads] Opportunity to provide input on planning for CSE 2 building: Monday March 16, 10:30am
To: cs-ugrads – Mailing List <cs-ugrads@cs.washington.edu>
Cc: ugrad-advisor – Email Alias <ugrad-advisor@cs.washington.edu>
As you likely are aware, the department and university are in the early
stages of planning for an additional CSE building that will include
classrooms and very significantly enhanced undergraduate spaces, new
space for advising, as well as allowing for significant growth in
everything we do. This will augment, but not replace, the bulk of our
current undergraduate spaces in the Allen Center, though we will leave
Sieg Hall behind.
This Monday, March 16 at 10:30am-12 in the Gates Commons, CSE691, there
will be an opportunity for you to give us feedback about our current
space and about what you think will be important characteristics for the
new building:
Some things to think about:
General-purpose computing and other general-purpose spaces:
– What types of general-purpose (computing) spaces will best
support you and your work? How do you think that will change for
students in the future?
– What do you think the balance should be between structured
and unstructured computing environments?
– What works or doesn’t about our current general computing
labs? What aspects would you keep? How would you change them? Are
they the right size?
Undergraduate-focused space beyond general-purpose computing.
– What additional support/amenity spaces do you think are
important? (We have some ideas based on what you have told us before
but would like to get the input from you.)
– There other current special-purpose things we do, from
capstones to on-going group activities that we will support in the new
building. What characteristics should the spaces that support these have?
– What other kinds of spaces do you think we need?
What good examples do you know of spaces for any of the above that you’d
like to see more of?
Are there any other aspects of the building that you’d like to give
input on?
Thanks,
Paul Beame
P.S. While group discussions seem particularly effective at bringing
out good ideas, if you can’t make it to the meeting we will also put up
a Catalyst survey. Details to follow.